CCCToad on 8/1/2010 at 20:28
Quote Posted by dethtoll
Swiss chocolate sounds good.
But it gives you cancer.
Aerothorn on 8/1/2010 at 21:26
On one hand, I totally support GBM's point and have been forlorn with the direction things have taken (here I was, thinking the thread couldn't get worse).
On the other hand, WE WERE THIS CLOSE TO PAGE 30 AND I WAS GOING TO MAKE A MINT.
Master Villain on 8/1/2010 at 23:37
Do we all get a cut for helping you achieve your dubious page 30 victory?
PotatoGuy on 8/1/2010 at 23:42
This post doesn't make sense. I just want my cut for helping reaching page 30. :)
june gloom on 8/1/2010 at 23:44
When you guys get it to the actual page 30 then we'll talk.
SubJeff on 8/1/2010 at 23:45
Word to that, you default losers.
Macha on 9/1/2010 at 01:13
Are we there yet?
Fragony on 12/1/2010 at 13:24
Well that is tragic for the apocalypse-cravers and those growing fat on their fears, now if we bring back global temperature with 2 degrees, is it then still a mini-iceage or a moderate one?
zombe on 12/1/2010 at 13:25
Quote Posted by CCCToad
A link NOT worth reading
fixed.
Quote Posted by CCCToad
posting because I'm curious what everyone else thinks about it.
It is complete garbage. Not that you could expect anything sensible after this:
Quote Posted by DailyMail
The bitter winter afflicting much of the Northern Hemisphere is only the start of a global trend towards cooler weather that is likely to last for 20 or 30 years, say some of the world’s most eminent climate scientists.
Their predictions – based on an analysis of natural cycles in water temperatures in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans – challenge some of the global warming orthodoxy’s most deeply cherished beliefs, such as the claim that the North Pole will be free of ice in
summer by 2013.
According to the US National Snow and Ice Data Centre in Colorado, Arctic summer sea ice has increased by 409,000 square miles, or 26 per cent, since 2007 – and even the most committed global warming activists do not dispute this.
(btw, the NSIDC quote itself is correct - it is the blatant misuse that puts me off)
Nothing to discuss here (for me anyway).
