Aerothorn on 25/12/2009 at 02:07
Quote Posted by Fragony
Well the security council comprising of rogue states
I don't quite understand what you mean by "rogue state." Under what definition are China, France, Russia, the UK, and the USA "rogue states"? Unless you're referring to Libya, and A. one country != "comprising of, and B. Their stint ends this month.
Fragony on 25/12/2009 at 02:25
Quote Posted by Aerothorn
I don't quite understand what you mean by "rogue state." Under what definition are China, France, Russia, the UK, and the USA "rogue states"? Unless you're referring to Libya, and A. one country != "comprising of, and B. Their stint ends this month.
Well what is it you want to get out of it anyway, and how are you going to do it. UN is too big to do anything now unless absolutely nothing is something. More sluggish bureaucracy, as if we didn't have enough of that, and something much more creepy underneath.
Namdrol on 25/12/2009 at 02:49
Quote Posted by Fragony
Israel has every right to complain that the UN is being one-sided
What the cock sucking arse fuckingmuther fuck you on about fragony? First you tell us climate change is total fuckin' bullshit, then you say the Palestinians are in the wrong? Oh god is this real?
:sweat:
ceebs on 25/12/2009 at 02:58
Quote:
PR and NGO's funded by,
What?
And what has the UN done that is biassed against Israel?
Fragony on 25/12/2009 at 09:07
Start a new thread and I'll tell you all about it
Master Villain on 25/12/2009 at 09:23
Only if you promise to keep replying to this one with your ever-crazier climate chance conspiracy theories. It's comedy gold.
Fragony on 25/12/2009 at 09:49
Quote Posted by Master Villain
Only if you promise to keep replying to this one with your ever-crazier climate chance conspiracy theories. It's comedy gold.
Well start laughing, at it's very basic level we are still at;
- manipulated data
- no rise in temperature for 10 (11) years
- a 0.6 degrees rise in a 100 years they want to bring back with 2 wtf?
- poles should be in singular
- polar bears are nasty and doing great
ceebs on 26/12/2009 at 16:43
Quote Posted by Fragony
Well start laughing, at it's very basic level we are still at;
- manipulated data
- no rise in temperature for 10 (11) years
- a 0.6 degrees rise in a 100 years they want to bring back with 2 wtf?
- poles should be in singular
- polar bears are nasty and doing great
well im laughing at
- clutching at straws
- wrong (there has been a rise, and adjusting to eleven years minimises the rise but is still wrong)
- gibberish
- havent we got two poles?
- and the polar bears are doing well is particularly wrong and stupid.
oRGy on 26/12/2009 at 17:50
FEMA camps
