ceebs on 13/12/2009 at 16:18
well thats nicely edited so you get the one question taken out of context, and the professer says hes not going to condemn someone on the back of somthing he hasnt read the questioner then is attempting to insist that he does.
Looking at his films the evidence there exhibits in places a special kind of stupid, for example the fact he dosnt appear to understand that US temperatures and global temperatures are different
Starrfall on 13/12/2009 at 17:03
Quote Posted by Fragony
What evidence
Pet nitwit in action!
Ain't he cute, folks?
(We could try pointing out that the reason we're not talking about the ozone layer and acid rain is because we did something about those problems and now they're getting better but he's obviously only got the most tenuous grip on reality and he'd only sink farther into his fantasy land where since correlation doesn't equal causation it also can't even be evidence of causation.)
ercles on 13/12/2009 at 17:53
Quote Posted by Fragony
Look mia muca, in the late 19th century a salesman wrote a letter to the Brittish parlement with the water from the Thames. Even the wolf is on return we expect them here next year. In the south of the Netherlands bobcats are back. And fucking lampreys as well fuck nature right there but still. Polarbears are doing fine as well, most die from bullets because they are getting too close. Is reality.
Man I always catch onto trolling way too late, but this was a tip off. I'm just going to be an optimist and hope that this is the case, because I like to live in my own fantasy world where no one is this monumentally stupid.
CCCToad on 13/12/2009 at 18:07
Hard to tell, really.
But as far as good arguments against global warming go, Fragony's isn't one of them. For example, one of the IPCC documents I downloaded pointed out that the temperature at rural ground stations has been flat, which is a logical reason to question. Simply stating repeatedly that "Earth isn't warming" without a backing isn't a logical reason.
Then again, I do think he is trolling, as his replies have gotten down to short, single sentence quips that don't even try to make a logical argument but still get everyone riled up into a frenzy because everyone here seems to feel very strongly about the topic.
Koki on 13/12/2009 at 18:10
Quote Posted by Fragony
But the data is still wrong, the earth hasn't been warming up for 10(11?) years.
Okay.
zombe on 13/12/2009 at 19:10
Troll or not, can't deny it is amazing ... and shocking ... that we are wondering whether he is or not (in a "Shelley the republican" way).
june gloom on 13/12/2009 at 21:21
God dammit Fragony will you fucking stop ARGUING
WHO ARE YOU, DAVEW? SHUT UP ALREADY.
Kolya on 13/12/2009 at 22:17
Attacking him for reacting to all the attention aimed at him does nothing.
Fragony on 14/12/2009 at 09:47
Quote Posted by zombe
Troll or not, can't deny it is amazing ... and shocking ... that we are wondering whether he is or not (in a "Shelley the republican" way).
I have been posting here since 2002, never troll why would I start now.
CCCToad on 14/12/2009 at 16:50
because its just too much fun to troll people who get worked up about global warming?
