Muzman on 6/12/2009 at 14:10
Since you've discredited all the primary sources, you must tell us where you're getting your data.
Fragony on 6/12/2009 at 14:21
Quote Posted by Muzman
Since you've discredited all the primary sources, you must tell us where you're getting your data.
Am I to be the one on the defence? I have never believed in man-made global warming it's too crazy and as it turns out I probably was right, the science behind it can't be taken for granted anymore anyhow.
Muzman on 6/12/2009 at 14:33
Well, it's been pointed out to you several times that all the reasons you think man made global warming is wrong (that you've bothered to share with us), are themselves wrong. So yes, you are on the defence.
Fragony on 6/12/2009 at 14:42
Quote Posted by Muzman
Well, it's been pointed out to you several times that all the reasons you think man made global warming is wrong (that you've bothered to share with us), are themselves wrong. So yes, you are on the defence.
Having an opinion isn't the same thing as setting out the party line, some things just are, amazingly.
Namdrol on 6/12/2009 at 14:54
But the beauty of the scientific method is that it demands proof that things "just are", and it sets out to find the how and the why, with verifiable results.
But I can't quite understand your last comment Fragony, on the face of it, it seems to make sense, till I started to think about it.
Fragony on 6/12/2009 at 15:10
Yeah science
what comment? sorry made more then one
Aerothorn on 6/12/2009 at 15:51
Quote Posted by Fragony
Sometimes, so you are saying Fox is lying? That would probably result in a rectification that is how it works, no rectification yet so it must be true
I think you're confusing your own media laws with ours. In the United States, news stations are not required to tell the truth: as long as what they say isn't outright libelous, they can make shit up all day long.
Also: WTF on "Climategate." Has the media NO imagination? Any scandal of any sort, just nonsensically stick "gate" at the end? Can't we be a little more creative here?
P.S. I would really like to read some of Fragony's history essays to see if his thought process on his subject of expertise mirrors the way he handles science.
june gloom on 6/12/2009 at 18:36
Fragony's debate skills make me look like a master deliberater. Hell, even CCChoad and Thief13x look good in comparison.
Fragony on 6/12/2009 at 18:44
Quote Posted by Aerothorn
I think you're confusing your own media laws with ours. In the United States, news stations are not required to tell the truth: as long as what they say isn't outright libelous, they can make shit up all day long.
That is simply not true. I am quite envious of the level of debate in US media, it is something to be admired we don´t have that here, not that sharp at least.
june gloom on 6/12/2009 at 18:57
Wow.
