Kilana on 29/8/2002 at 17:33
I had no idea... I thought it would be like most other rpg games where the sex made no difference... Makes me think bethseda is sexist now...
Forsythe on 29/8/2002 at 17:55
Hrm... how so? Back in my HS, the girls were generally more intelligent than the boys, who were generally stronger. (Note that I said 'generally'.. there were exceptions, but that was the general trend)
Loric on 29/8/2002 at 20:28
I'd say it's high time for a new character then...a feminine one...just in time for the unveiling of the PC version of MW at our house. I'll just make some [fortify attribute] enchantments when she starts moving up levels to make her just as good, or better of a male version of same race/class, etc. Yippee!!! It's a girl!
Forsythe on 29/8/2002 at 21:28
Quote:
Originally posted by Loric to make her just as good, or better of a male version of same race/class, etc.I must be missing something here... each of the racial stats that Primussucks was kind enough to provide shows that while the female of the species is lower in one or two attributes, she's higher in something else by the same amount. How's that make the female characters not as good as the males, then? :confused:
jstnomega on 29/8/2002 at 23:23
Primus, Thx for the effort.
Re the RedGd char Male vs Female strength disparity of 50 vs 40 - not a 10% but a 20% differential. Just a starting point differential & does not stay at such a %? Depends upon how one 'spends' one' level ups?
Having fun in spite of not knowing wth I'm doing or why.
Primussucks on 30/8/2002 at 00:07
no problem :thumb:
ACT SMILEY on 30/8/2002 at 11:29
jstnomega, yeah, its not a 20% penalty, its just a lower starting point, like I said.
