piln on 2/2/2006 at 20:14
EQ: 47 "On average women score around 47 and men score around 42"
SQ: 24 "On average women score around 24 and men score around 30"
Erm... :erm:
jay pettitt on 2/2/2006 at 21:05
EQ = 10 - My head is broke.
SQ I won a low average - but wasn't paying much attention because the questions were loaded or not relevant so I couldn't answer truthfully. I'm interested in the engine capacity of a car for example - but only if it gets me into a low tax bracket. Severall questions related to things like telly and flying that I just don't do.
Wyclef on 2/2/2006 at 21:20
Quote Posted by aguywhoplaysthief
Essentially, what TGGP's 0 score means is that neither I, or anyone else really, would want to ever meet him in real life, and if they did, would try to make the encounter as short as possible.
Did we really need a test to tell us that?
EDIT:
EQ: 12
SQ: 47
Concerning the EQ score: It's not that I don't care or think about people -- though I do so most strongly in the abstract, which I suppose is systematic thinking -- it's that I have a hard time interacting with them, reading emotions, and intuitively grasping the rules of social situations. Actually, I would like an instruction manual on that sort of thing (the science of protocol?), but again I suppose that's systematic thinking.
"When an election is being held, I am not interested in the results for each constituency."
"I find it difficult to read and understand maps."
Haha, it's like they wrote those questions just for me
descenterace on 2/2/2006 at 21:53
EQ: 18, which is roughly what I expected.
SQ test doesn't appear to work at all, and even the EQ one was intermittent. I don't care enough to be bothered doing the HTML test.
Strangely, the SWF files return a 404 when I try to reach them directly.
Quote Posted by Wyclef
Concerning the EQ score: It's not that I don't care or think about people -- though I do so most strongly in the abstract, which I suppose is systematic thinking -- it's that I have a hard time interacting with them, reading emotions, and intuitively grasping the rules of social situations. Actually, I would like an instruction manual on that sort of thing (the science of protocol?), but again I suppose that's systematic thinking.
Same here. I have trouble understanding how people can learn these social 'rules' in the first place; does everyone else get a manual and I just forgot to fill in the order form? :p
Morrgan on 2/2/2006 at 22:12
EQ: 33
SQ: 29
Does this mean I have a man's brain? :erg:
Jenesis on 2/2/2006 at 22:20
EQ - 49
SQ - 43
Given the groupings, I can't say I'm surprised at either score there. Even though I'm awful at strategy games :)
LesserFollies on 2/2/2006 at 22:27
51 and 28, respectively.
I'm such a GIRL :\
aguywhoplaysthief on 2/2/2006 at 22:38
Quote Posted by Rug Burn Junky
Can you lose points on the empathy quiz for your own startling lack of self awareness?
You're asking me?
Renegen on 2/2/2006 at 22:51
WAY to many questions, I got bored at 30, maybe 35. Damn how long will it go for? I'll post my results soon...
34
52
Some dumb questions I thought. "Do you wonder about how the river connects to the sea" No..
"Do you follow the latest trends in fashion, "Do you get emotionaly attached to your friend's problems" No..
MsLedd on 2/2/2006 at 22:58
Quote Posted by Morrgan
Does this mean I have a man's brain? :erg:
I have one. I keep it in a jar on my desk. :cheeky:
