Aedryn on 9/8/2003 at 20:38
Quote:
Originally posted by Child of Karras If so, then why call it THIEF and not CRUSADER? It's a stealth game but you don't have to use stealth? Not much sense is there? It's like saying you can play puzzle bobble without having to match the bubbles accordinly to thier color. Yeah but those are the rules to that game. There are no rules that specify you can't run around killing everyone or shooting fire arrows everywhere. No rule states that you must never be seen or heard (I'm talking generally so don't bring up missions).
The best quality of Thief is the choice. The game starts you off and tells you what to do and where to go, how you get there is your choice.
Morrgan on 9/8/2003 at 20:58
Quote:
Originally posted by Child of Karras If so, then why call it THIEF and not CRUSADER? Why would Garrett even drag a sword around if he never intended to use it? Have a look at the game manual under "Combat". The first line reads: "Sometimes, thieving can be made easier by a measured application of force." It's obviously a part of the game.
Personally I prefer to sneak as quietly as possible, but if I screw up and alert guards I draw the sword (as long as the objectives allow it). It's still thieving if you ask me.
w_hairst on 10/8/2003 at 01:28
To those who argue over whether using the sword or blackjack is the "right way" to play Thief 1/2, let me ask you this - what is the "right" way to go through a mansion-like mission - bottom to top, top to bottom, west to east, randomly? It all depends on your preferred playing style. It is correct to knock out every guard in a mission, and it is just as correct to ghost a mission, or to kill everything that moves - so long as the objectives are satisfied. Whether I sneak by a guard, sneak up behind and knock him/her out, kill him/her with a stealthy backstab, kill him/her in face-to-face combat, or pick him/her off with a broadhead from a long distance, I'm still playing Thief, and I'm still playing by the rules.
Child of Karras, there is nothing wrong with using the sword on humans, and certainly not on monsters, particuarly hammer haunts. The sword is quite useful in some situations against AIs, not to mention cutting banners... And yes, I do try to stay hidden. You can certainly play any way you wish - as Aedryn said, "The best quality of Thief is the choice." I'll personally continue using the sword.
I'm playing Calendra's Legacy now... [spoiler]I'm dodging and killing zombies in the city at the moment. The magical sword works fairly well for this purpose, but they're still awfully fast. I generally backstab them, but sometimes go head to head. BTW, there's this weird translucent monster-like apparition (not of a dead human) that appears now and then and looks like it's attacking me. But when I hit it, I gain hitpoints. Anyone know what this is, and if it's a glitch about the hitpoints?[/spoiler]
Shadowknight434 on 10/8/2003 at 02:58
I like to use the sword on occastion as well. It's a lot of fun to piss off a couple of guards and fight them off within an inch of your life.
Just today I fought off a pair of them in Ambush. I was perring their thrusts off as I backed up the stairs, I raised my sword high above my head, and jumped over them while i swung, hitting the one in the back and killing him. I spun around with a left to right slash, hit the remaining guard in the side, which threw him off balance. I raised up again, and smacked him on the head for the final blow.
I felt like a musketter or something. I didn't even loose any health.
Child of Karras on 10/8/2003 at 05:06
I did not say the sword was completey useless. I know it is required in places like RTTHC or to take down tapestries but I find it unacceptable to use it against a guard just to get rid of him. But take a look you guys, you can take out the guards (not referring to alerted AIs) with one swing of the blackjack plus it's silent and leaves no blood. Sword on the other hand...
Let's start from the top. Thief is a game of stealth. You need to make sure you stay hidden and no one catches you right? At times you may need to take down a guard or too. Two choices. Sword of Blackjack? With the sword, he screams as he falls and leaves a puddle of blood. With the Blackjack, you take him out silently. Obvioulsy, the most sensible weapon to use here is the Blackjack am I right? Why create more trouble when you already have enough shit to go through?
And you men talk about the freedom of play? Sure but if head on assaults were acceptable, don't you think they would have made it easier? Afterall, this is about stealth and not about racking up the body count.
Jae on 10/8/2003 at 05:31
I'd use the sword, but it's pretty clear the developers didn't want you to...
>Garrett is so preoccupied with not dropping the sword, other motor skills such as...MOVING are hampered.
>Garrett is a lousy swordsman...he takes forever to finish of a guard and the noise that results from the duel will bring more guards...
>Even if you split a guard's skull in half from behind, he bellows loudly and bleeds all over the place. Cue more guards sniffing around...
>On expert, don't even think about swordfighting... >_>
>Blackjacking is so easy!
There's simply no profit in dueling guards...
Morrgan on 10/8/2003 at 06:16
Quote:
Originally posted by Child of Karras And you men talk about the freedom of play? Sure but if head on assaults were acceptable, don't you think they would have made it easier? Afterall, this is about stealth and not about racking up the body count. I'm not a man, but I'll reply anyway. :p
This is a
game. A game that's played for
fun. That's what it's about. I like having several ways to choose from when playing, that's part of the fun. Yes, the game was meant to mainly be played stealthily. Still, if there was only that option, it would get dull after a while.
I agree with you about non-alerted guards; they're much easier to blackjack or simply avoid. I doubt anyone here's saying they always go around killing everything that moves. I just think it's a part of the game to try to make it without reloading if I happen to alert guards, and sometimes that means swordfighting. In those cases I don't think it's a problem to use a sword to get rid of a guard.
Hagatha on 10/8/2003 at 06:29
Garret is a thief, not a swordsman. The sword should only ever be used to take out the odd wall hanging or piece of wood blocking a doorway.
theImmortalThief on 10/8/2003 at 06:57
I've discovered a method much easier that blocking (for me at least). I take a slash or two at the enemy then go back two steps so that his sword won't hit me when he swings, then go in front, two more slashes and back again. It works on about any apponent. (except bowmen)
Aedryn on 10/8/2003 at 18:10
Quote:
Originally posted by w_hairst spoiler That's the Ghost of Jortul if I remember correctly. I believe it can only be drowned.
As for the hitpoints think about the name of the sword :)