Aja on 5/2/2009 at 04:48
Quote Posted by Vivian
Surely whether or not someone is an atheist depends entirely on your definition of deities. If you replace 'god' with 'the universe', I suppose I'm basically religious.
replace it with "John Coltrane"
Stitch on 5/2/2009 at 05:00
"booze"
Aja on 5/2/2009 at 05:22
"fucking"
Am I right??
"crayons"
Morte on 5/2/2009 at 07:46
Whether Einstein was an atheist or not is irrelevant*, anyone who trots his opinion out as a definitive argument that will "embarass" someone still fails spectacularly. Just because he was clever at physics doesn't make him an unfallible authority on religion, and there's no reason to put him on a pedestal over all the others who have pondered the question throughout the years. If you believe otherwise, you're simply wrong.
And if you actually do know better, and still trot it out in an effort to humiliate those that don't you're a humongous cock that should be beaten with a rubber hose.
*OK, so it makes someone extra full of fail if he actually held the opposing position.
Rogue Keeper on 5/2/2009 at 07:57
Oh shut up.
june gloom on 5/2/2009 at 08:18
HAHA FETT
though +5 to wormrat for cleverness
D'Juhn Keep on 5/2/2009 at 10:01
Quote Posted by BR796164
Always a pleasure to embarass intellectually inferior atheists by quoting classics. :angel:
Quote Posted by BR796164
This is precisely the kind of cynical nihillism which arose when the post-modern society killed spirituality by materialism, but forgot to fill the vacuum with positive humanism.
Quote Posted by BR796164
He took it personally. GOOD!
Quote Posted by BR796164
Oh shut up.
BR796164, forum interlectual
Rogue Keeper on 5/2/2009 at 10:16
What Morte said so far doesn't really motivate me to respond in a highly sophisticated, intellectually humiliating manner. It is quite time consuming.
But then I'm glad someone turned a mere quotation into another internet affair. Social debate over metaphysical questions never hurts. ;)
