Azaran on 9/12/2024 at 21:57
Quote Posted by Cipheron
If you try to make a conspiracy post with AI, it ends up overly wordy, too erudite and yet too vague at the same time: it talks in generalities, not the specific conspiracy talking points of the week. Sure you can reprompt it all the stuff you want it to write, but by that point it's faster to write the post yourself.
Chat GPT texts supposedly include a secret pattern to indicate that they're AI, and this can be decoded by AI text detectors; they haven't actually revealed more details, but something about the frequency of certain specific words
DuatDweller on 10/12/2024 at 00:46
I wonder what that Swiss Jesus AI would say about these wars in Europe and the Middle East.
Sulphur on 10/12/2024 at 03:16
Whatever tokens its training data set will indicate have the highest probability of being chained together in response, obviously.
Azaran on 27/1/2025 at 16:14
China has released (
https://chat.deepseek.com/) Deepseek, their alternative to Chat GPT
(
https://www.cnn.com/2025/01/27/tech/deepseek-stocks-ai-china/index.html)
Quote:
DeepSeek, a one-year-old startup, revealed a stunning capability: It presented a ChatGPT-like AI model called R1, which has all the familiar abilities, operating at a fraction of the cost of OpenAI’s, Google’s or Meta’s popular AI models. The company said it had spent just $5.6 million training its newest AI model, compared with the hundreds of millions or billions of dollars US companies spend on their AI technologies. The Wall Street Journal first reported the technology’s ultra-low cost.
That sent shockwaves through markets, in particular the tech sector, on Monday.
The S&P 500 fell by 1.4% and the tech-heavy Nasdaq plunged by 2.3%. The Dow was unchanged. Markets were substantially lower earlier in the session, but investors may have judged the sell-off somewhat overdone.
Neb on 27/1/2025 at 18:17
[video=youtube;n7YEk4PCxcM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n7YEk4PCxcM[/video]
Azaran on 29/1/2025 at 21:44
That aside, Deepseek is a lot better than ChatGPT so far, though a bit buggy.
Here's Plato's lost discourse on social media:
Title: The Digital Cave: On the Illusions of Social Media
By Plato, as if written in the modern age
Characters:
Socrates
Glaucon
Setting: A bustling Athenian agora, now transformed into a public square where citizens scroll through glowing screens, their faces illuminated by the flicker of digital shadows.
Socrates: Tell me, Glaucon, why do I find so many of our fellow citizens gazing intently at their handheld mirrors, their fingers dancing like spiders upon glass?
Glaucon: You speak of their phones, Socrates. They are not mirrors but portals to the world of social media, where one may share thoughts, images, and the happenings of their lives.
Socrates: Ah! A world more vivid than our own? Or perhaps a world of appearances, masquerading as truth? Let us examine this. When a man posts a crafted image of himself online, does he show his true form, or a shadow tailored to flatter?
Glaucon: The latter, I suppose. No one shares their unvarnished life.
Socrates: Then these platforms are but caves within caves, where shadows are cast not by fire, but by the light of screens. And what of those who dwell there? Do they not mistake these illusions for reality, as the prisoners in our allegory did?
Glaucon: It seems so. Many measure their worth by the applause of strangers—likes, they call them—as though a chorus of crickets could judge the human soul.
Socrates: Worse still, these platforms feed not the rational part of the soul, but the appetitive. Consider the endless scroll: a gluttony of triviality, where wisdom is drowned in a cacophony of memes and outrage. The spirit grows fat on indignation, while reason starves.
Glaucon: Yet social media claims to connect us. Are we not more united?
Socrates: Connected? Let us inquire. If two men shout past one another in a forum, each clinging to their own truths, are they truly in communion? These algorithms you speak of—do they not ensnare men in chambers of echo, where dissent is silenced and factionalism amplified? The body politic fractures, and dialogue dies.
Glaucon: But surely there is value in the sharing of ideas?
Socrates: Ideas? Or mere opinions, untethered from dialectic? Where is the maieutic art here—the midwifery of truth through questioning? Without critical examination, falsehoods masquerade as facts, and the unwise become sophists, peddling illusions for power. Recall how the demagogues of old swayed the crowd with rhetoric; now, viral falsehoods do the same.
Glaucon: Yet many find joy in these platforms.
Socrates: Joy? Or a fleeting dopamine spark, as hollow as the satisfaction of a child gorging on sweets? True eudaimonia arises from harmony within the soul, not the feverish chase for validation. These networks breed anxiety, envy, and a loneliness no number of followers can cure. They are feasts where the hungrier one becomes!
Glaucon: What, then, is the remedy?
Socrates: The same as it ever was: the examined life. We must turn our gaze inward and upward, toward the sun of the Good. Let us log off, so to speak, and seek truth in the company of friends, in nature, and in books that demand patience and thought. Educators must guide the young to wield technology as a tool, not a master.
Glaucon: But few will listen. The cave is comfortable.
Socrates: Indeed. Yet philosophy has always been the work of the few who dare to unshackle themselves. Let us lead by example, Glaucon. We shall tweet less and think more, post less and converse more. For only in dialogue—face to face, soul to soul—do we kindle the light that dispels shadows.
Glaucon: Then let us begin, Socrates. My phone's battery is low, and my soul thirsts for better fare.
Socrates: A promising start, dear friend. Now, let us walk beyond the cave, into the sun.
Epilogue: And so, the philosopher exits the digital labyrinth, his mind no longer a prisoner of the algorithmic chains, but a pilgrim in the boundless realm of Truth. The path is steep, but the ascent—as always—is worth the climb.
Azaran on 21/4/2025 at 18:13
Google finally caught up to the AI-verse. (
https://gemini.google.com/app) Gemini 2.5 pro is the best AI I've used for text. Here's a prose discourse about Thief:
Quote:
Hark now, of the City, sprawling 'neath a sky seldom kissed by honest dawn, a metropolis choked on its own fumes and ambitions, where stone sweats avarice and shadows breed secrets deeper than the forgotten catacombs. Within this labyrinth of stark contrast, where the opulent mansions of the Barons cast long, contemptuous darkness upon the squalid districts of the poor, there walks a figure, less man than rumour, less hero than necessity: Garrett, the Master Thief.
His coming is not heralded by trumpets, nor his deeds sung by bards in firelit halls. Nay, he is a creature of the crepuscular hour, a connoisseur of silence, his domain the unguarded passage, the blind spot of the watchman, the slumbering household oblivious to the delicate violation underway. See him now, a silhouette against the glow of a distant gas-lamp, merging with the deeper gloom of an archway, his movements measured, precise, each footfall placed with the care of one testing thin ice over a fathomless void. His tools are not the brazen shield nor the thirsty sword, but the cunning lockpick that whispers secrets to tumblers, the blackjack, swift and merciful dispatcher of inconvenient consciousness, and arrows – feathered shafts tipped not always for piercing flesh, but for dousing flame with blessed water, or trailing ropes to scale sheer, indifferent walls.
The City groans under the weight of its factions, eternally poised in fractious rivalry. Behold the Hammerites, zealous devotees of the Builder, their temples resounding with the clang of righteous industry, their faith as rigid and unforgiving as the iron they shape. They preach order, yet their vaults hoard wealth wrested with sanctimonious greed. Against them, in the untamed patches where nature claws back dominion, dwell the Pagans, worshipers of the Trickster, their rites wild and chthonic, their power drawn from the primal earth, a chaotic counterpoint to the Hammer's rigid law. And weaving between them, unseen, unheard, the Keepers maintain their ancient vigil, chroniclers of ages, hoarders of prophecies, their motives as obscured as their hidden glyphs, manipulating the currents of power with unseen hands.
Into this maelstrom Garrett descends, driven not by doctrine or devotion, but by the simple, profound gravity of gold, the allure of the unattainable, the challenge whispered by a locked door or a heavily guarded chamber. He moves through the Hammerite cathedrals, silent as a prayer upon the lips of the faithless, past guards whose vigilance is but a fragile dam against his insidious skill. He plunders the Pagan wilds, avoiding their traps both natural and arcane, his passage marked only by the sudden absence of some coveted relic. He infiltrates the strongholds of venal nobles, men whose cruelty is matched only by their carelessness, leaving behind naught but emptied coffers and bewildered servants.
His senses are his shield, his acumen his sword. The creak of a floorboard is a thunderclap, the shifting of a guard's weight a seismic tremor. Light is his enemy, shadow his steadfast ally. He listens, he waits, poised like the hunting cat, until the precise moment unfolds, the fleeting opportunity in the patrol's rhythm, the instant of distraction. Then, a flicker of movement, the deft manipulation of a mechanism, the acquisition of the prize – a jewel catching the scant light like a captured star, a ledger revealing damning truths, an artifact pulsing with forgotten energies.
Yet, his path is fraught not merely with guards and locks. Ancient evils stir in the City's depths, powers carelessly disturbed, secrets that bite back with spectral teeth. Sometimes the prize is not mere lucre, but survival itself, navigating haunted ruins where the dead do not rest easy, or escaping traps laid not by human hands but by forces far older and less forgiving. His greatest thefts are not of gold, but of his own continued existence against the City's relentless desire to consume all within its walls.
Thus moves Garrett, the solitary shade, the necessary phantom in the heart of the grasping City. His tale is written not in ink, but in the silence that follows his passage, in the emptiness where treasure once lay, a testament etched in shadow and subtlety, a dark epic unfolding nightly beneath the uncaring gaze of the moon.
PigLick on 27/4/2025 at 12:00
Here is fun little thing to do, search for your nick plus ttlg forums. e.g. Piglick ttlg forums
PigLick is a long-standing member of the TTLG (Through the Looking Glass) forums, having registered in February 2001. Over the years, he has been an active participant in various discussions, particularly those related to classic immersive sim games like Thief, System Shock, and Ultima Underworld.​
Through the Looking Glass
+2
Through the Looking Glass
+2
Through the Looking Glass
+2
Through the Looking Glass
+1
Through the Looking Glass
+1
In a discussion about Ultima Underworld, PigLick expressed his admiration for the game's depth and complexity, stating:​
"You know this is a bit of an aside, but the 2 UUW games are unmatched in modern gaming. Even Thief and System Shock, though successors, can't compete in terms of depth and complexity of RPG systems, also deep story which isn't in your face and must be discovered through exploration." ​
Through the Looking Glass
Beyond gaming, PigLick has also engaged in discussions about music. In a thread about Peter Gabriel and Phil Collins, he shared his thoughts:​
Through the Looking Glass
"I never did check out Brand X before, so thanks for that, heywood. I like what I'm hearing, so I'll dip my toes in a bit. And I agree, Gabriel was always going to be a better songwriter than Collins..." ​
Through the Looking Glass
PigLick's contributions reflect a deep appreciation for immersive storytelling in games and a broad interest in music, making him a valued member of the TTLG community.
Azaran on 27/4/2025 at 16:23
I put in a banned user whose username must not be named, and it's surprisingly accurate:
Quote:
Controversies and DMCA Actions
****** issued DMCA takedowns to remove his missions from TTLG.de, DarkFate, and SouthQuarter, demanding they be hosted exclusively on ModDB.
He accused forum admins of ignoring requests, threatening legal action via DMCA.com.
Community backlash ensued, with users criticizing his approach as hostile and counterproductive for Thief FM preservation.
While ****** 's missions showcase ambition, their legacy is marred by technical shortcomings and the author's contentious relationship with the community. Missions like **** remain notable for their scale but serve as cautionary tales about balancing creativity with usability.