raevol on 21/8/2008 at 05:16
I see that avatars are disabled on this forum. The search function reveals to me that This Is So, but it does not tell me Why. Is there a particular reason for it? I personally have a hard time keeping track of users without avatars, for me it's like having a face to attach to a name.
Scots Taffer on 21/8/2008 at 05:55
BECAUSE
David on 21/8/2008 at 07:27
I have yet to see a forum that allows avatars that doesn't make me want to rip my eyes out.
mol on 21/8/2008 at 08:27
Besides, avatars wouldn't help you out any; you'd find 376 variants of Garrett, 145 of Benny, 76 Victorias, 400 artistic variations on wangs, and the rest would just copy Dave's picture and try to pass it off as their own.
addink on 21/8/2008 at 08:51
You forgot to mention the 98 seizure inducing blinking ones.
Matthew on 21/8/2008 at 09:42
Quote Posted by David
I have yet to see a forum that allows avatars that doesn't make me want to rip my eyes out.
PA is at least reasonable, but only up to a point.
shadowelven, we had a thread here where forums, huge sigs and all the usual nonsense were added for a time; participation in it convinced most of us that we were much better off without them.
marshall banana on 21/8/2008 at 23:04
*Stares longingly at the various berries*
rachel on 22/8/2008 at 09:25
I'd eat it.