Zanderat on 17/7/2006 at 23:41
Why does everyone ASSUME that SS3, if it does come out, will automatically be bad? Just curious.
Drat on 17/7/2006 at 23:57
A) Because of who is making it.
B) Because of who isn't making it.
C) Because of who is publishing it, and potentially holds a lot of creative control.
craigsimas on 18/7/2006 at 01:30
Quote Posted by Zanderat
Why does everyone ASSUME that SS3, if it does come out, will automatically be bad? Just curious.
I am keeping my pessimistic ways so I can be
'pleasantly supprised' when it does come out and dosen't suck.
BUT I am prepared for it if it does.:p
Zanderat on 20/7/2006 at 02:15
Well don't forget Doug Church works at EA............... :cool:
Myagi on 20/7/2006 at 04:07
Quote Posted by Zanderat
Well don't forget Doug Church works at EA............... :cool:
and don't forget he (and randy) are working on an original franchise with steven spielberg, as much as it would have made sense I'm afraid we can forget about that. Unless you know something we don't :)
Zanderat on 21/7/2006 at 03:14
Quote Posted by Myagi
and don't forget he (and randy) are working on an original franchise with steven spielberg, as much as it would have made sense I'm afraid we can forget about that. Unless you know something we don't :)
No inside scoop, I am afraid. But, I also don't think he allow it to go seriously awry (hopefully).
Tenkahubu on 21/7/2006 at 16:09
There is no reason at all to assume or even to hope that he will have any more say in the matter than you or I do.
fetgalningen on 30/7/2006 at 13:51
*Imagines for himself how System Shock 3 will look like some kind of fps shooter with Quake / Unreal engine and weapons like rail gun and chain gun*
Doooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo0000000000000000m....
Cycloptis on 5/8/2006 at 04:05
Let's hope this is false.
Zanderat on 6/8/2006 at 03:50
Quote Posted by Cycloptis
Let's hope this is false.
I don't get it. Why do people always react this way to SS3 possibilities? Myself, I would love more System Shock.
