Hewer on 10/12/2009 at 02:20
It's not a logo, it's an ambigram for pwyll.
SubJeff on 10/12/2009 at 13:52
if its not a logo why is it in this thread eh uh eh?
Briareos H on 10/12/2009 at 13:57
do you guys even know how to read
Hewer on 10/12/2009 at 14:24
Quote Posted by Subjective Effect
if its not a logo why is it in this thread eh uh eh?
Quote Posted by pwyll
Is there a taffer here who can make an ambiagram from the word "thief"?
geez
The Shroud on 11/12/2009 at 04:42
Looks great, Hewer! Very glyph-like. I'd be happy to see that included on the box somewhere (not necessarily for the title, but as something extra).
pwyll on 14/12/2009 at 20:31
I like it.
I think that the logo would be cool if it is an ambiagram.
WrEcK on 22/12/2009 at 10:41
Those who mentionned the sub-title as a point of interest were right in my opinion.
It's really not important, but thief: the dark shadows annoyed me as a title because it was missing the 3 in it. I figured if the first two bothered with it why not the third? The fourth is coming around and hopefully will revert back to how it's suppose to be. Thief + number + sub-title. I just dislike inconsistency.
jtr7 on 22/12/2009 at 12:24
Exactly. It should belong.
Also, you're the third person to call it "Dark Shadows" recently. What's going on? What language version is it?
MrMunkeepants on 23/12/2009 at 02:11
I think WrEcK is confused, and meant "Deadly Shadows."
WrEcK, I believe they dropped the "3" from DS was because they wanted to appeal to the new X-Box audience and were afraid too many people would avoid a "part 3" without having played the first two.
--
I haven't been monitoring the thread too closely, has anyone tried the stained glass "IV" behind the traditional scratched-look "THIEF"?
jtr7 on 23/12/2009 at 02:36
Nope. Go for it.
