faetal on 13/6/2021 at 18:18
I love how nbohr thinks that the whole world revolves around US politics.
Like yeah, people in India are dying left right and centre BECAUSE DEMOCRATS!
Also, that 1-4 list is basically a long form way of saying "I won't take seriously anyone who doesn't explicitly agree with me".
That's a nice way of never having to confront the possibility that you are talking shit.
nbohr1more on 13/6/2021 at 20:27
Quote Posted by faetal
I love how nbohr thinks that the whole world revolves around US politics.
Like yeah, people in India are dying left right and centre BECAUSE DEMOCRATS!
Also, that 1-4 list is basically a long form way of saying "I won't take seriously anyone who doesn't explicitly agree with me".
That's a nice way of never having to confront the possibility that you are talking shit.
India is one of China's primary geopolitical enemies. What a coincidence that they have been hit hardest...
lowenz on 14/6/2021 at 06:03
Quote Posted by nbohr1more
People should be allowed to discuss them and should not be censored.
Problem is not "TALKING". Problem is "SELF-OBSSESSING" thanks to "freedom of talk" and heterodirection of this self-obsessing process to manipulate political voting preferences.
You can easily manipulate people through their obsessions, paranoia is the perfect lever 'cause it's *NATURAL* (and free! - Free paranoia for
Freedom :D )
You know, ENGAGEMENT TACTICS (
The Left want to DESTROY your freedom of talk, thinking technocracy is the savior of mankind!!1111 Fuck the Left!!11 Protect your freedom AT ALL COST, fellow americans!!111 VOTE ME OR IT WILL BE HELL ON EARTH)
How can't you see that in Trump propaganda tactics? It's crystal clear! It's literally the same everywhere, like Georing, BY THE BOOK:
Of course the people don't want war. But after all, it's the leaders of the country who determine the policy, and it's always a simple matter to drag the people along whether it's a democracy, a fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship. Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism, and exposing the country to greater danger.faetal on 14/6/2021 at 09:48
So apparently, China didn't just create the virus, they also control how it behaves after release?
I suppose if you can imagine it, it must be real.
Note nbohr whinges about lefty science bias, but has yet to post a single actual source for any of the science he claims has happened. Not one.
lowenz on 14/6/2021 at 12:52
It's of course beyond ANY human science to control the evolution of a virus.
And no, there is no "fine pre-tuning in lab" here, in March 2020 I'm pretty sure me and my mother got it an overcrowed blood drawing center (never felt anything similar, just my immune reaction - maybe at a second exposure in April - being very similiar to the HBV one) and my impression was literelly "This thing is trying to colonize the lungs but it seems it doesn't know how" for 1 week and no sense of taste for the starting 2 days).
Starker on 14/6/2021 at 16:05
The conspiracy loons apparently also think China decided to release it in their own territory to draw attention to them, instead of, y'know, anywhere else.
nbohr1more on 14/6/2021 at 16:30
Quote Posted by Starker
The conspiracy loons apparently also think China decided to release it in their own territory to draw attention to them, instead of, y'know, anywhere else.
Plausible deniability. China can afford to lose half a billion lives so if they release it locally the collateral damage is negligible.
Chances are, the initial release was a lab leak instigated by a CIA operative.
Once China discovered this, they retaliated with secondary ( variant ) releases along with constraining the supply chain for PPE.
lowenz on 14/6/2021 at 19:05
Quote Posted by nbohr1more
Plausible deniability. China can afford to lose half a billion lives so if they release it locally the collateral damage is negligible.
Chances are, the initial release was a lab leak instigated by a CIA operative.
Once China discovered this,
they retaliated with secondary ( variant ) releases along with constraining the supply chain for PPE.
Please.....
Jashin on 15/6/2021 at 01:06
Quote Posted by nbohr1more
Plausible deniability. China can afford to lose half a billion lives so if they release it locally the collateral damage is negligible.
This is one of the most disgusting things I've read in a while.
