Renzatic on 24/6/2020 at 01:24
Also, Girl Scout cookies are actually pretty good. I'm just using them in my hypothetical example here.
But they are overpriced.
nbohr1more on 24/6/2020 at 04:30
Quote Posted by faetal
Doesn't matter. Thinking a global pandemic is somehow focussed around US politics is the most US-centric thing I've heard this year.
Do you want to link to relevant wikileaks and reference which specific parts back up your insane claims? Or did you get it from (
www.realtruththatisntdeepstatelies.org) and just assume that they exist?
I will continue to search for it but I believe one of the DCCC documents had multiple "contingency plans" to deal with the disaster of a Trump win and there were
mortality projections and all that for each possible scenario. I think a few reddit CTR employees wrote it off as someone working for the DNC joking about stuff.
I would too if all these other disasters didn't neatly coincide with DNC goals... Anyway, until I find it again you can celebrate the egg on my face if that floats your boat.
Regardless, I still have this:
(
http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/10/the-top-100-most-damaging-wikileaks/)
There are real crimes in there... The site looks hokey but it's all sourced.
faetal on 24/6/2020 at 12:50
Quote Posted by nbohr1more
I will continue to search for it but I believe one of the DCCC documents had multiple "contingency plans" to deal with the disaster of a Trump win and there were
mortality projections and all that for each possible scenario. I think a few reddit CTR employees wrote it off as someone working for the DNC joking about stuff.
I would too if all these other disasters didn't neatly coincide with DNC goals... Anyway, until I find it again you can celebrate the egg on my face if that floats your boat.
Regardless, I still have this:
(
http://themillenniumreport.com/2016/10/the-top-100-most-damaging-wikileaks/)
There are real crimes in there... The site looks hokey but it's all sourced.
That's quite a lot ot read through. The standard etiquette, as I hinted above, os to match your specific calims to specific sources which back those claims.
So if you could go back through your posts, pick out the mad claims you've been making which you think are backed by wikileaks, then indicate which specific leak is backing it up.
Surely you can understand how that is the fastest route to your own credibility?
Otherwise, you're more or less admitting that you don't have the relevant information to hand, which to an outside observer, is indistinguishable from it not existing.
Sulphur on 24/6/2020 at 13:09
Quote Posted by Renzatic
Also, Girl Scout cookies are actually pretty good. I'm just using them in my hypothetical example here.
But they are overpriced.
(
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m-gYY5cR8M8) Make your own, scrub.
Nicker on 24/6/2020 at 18:00
TLDC.
They can practice on the Trump cabal.
faetal on 24/6/2020 at 18:31
Nbohr - please don't waste my time.
Tell me which of your earlier claims in this thread can be backed up by which part of specific cables.
You imply that you have "done your research", which means that you shouldn't need anyone to repeat your legwork.
Instead of forcing me to spend >1 hour reading, just quote the relevant parts from each cable.
You are the one with conclusions, just show your working, I have a demanding job, 2 kids and very time-consuming hobbies. I don't have time to repeat your legwork.
Also, note that the pay-off for this will be that I may take the specific parts backed up by wikileaks cables more seriously (assuming you are courteous enough to show your working). Anything not backed up specific cources (e.g. the CIA created COVID-19 as a bioweapon), won't be getting a free-ride on the coat tails of any other substantiated parts.
Renzatic on 24/6/2020 at 23:54
If these leaks say what you're claiming they're saying, then why isn't Barr, the DOJ, and the greater GOP using it against Obama and Hillary now?
You'd think that with so much damning information at their disposal, they wouldn't have to rely on such weak evidence to hype up an Obamagate.
Renzatic on 25/6/2020 at 01:34
(
https://thehill.com/homenews/house/504429-gop-house-candidate-publishes-23-page-report-claiming-george-floyd-death-was?fbclid=IwAR1x3aPsxaJKL5iIGRD8hZwotrpffzPfgdOWU9pT5yitUVuZebmdtcx6crY) This is America, yall.
Quote:
A Republican candidate running for a St. Louis-area House seat has published a 23-page document outlining a conspiracy theory that the footage of George Floyd's death in police custody, which has ignited weeks of protests, was staged to inflame racial tensions.
“We conclude that no one in the video is really one person but rather they are all digital composites of two or more real people to form completely new digital persons using deepfake technology,” Winnie Heartstrong, who is running against Rep. Wm. Lacy Clay (D-Mo.), wrote.
The document, which Heartstrong claims was written with the aid of “citizen investigators,” alleges Floyd died long before May 25. It also repeats a conspiracy theory that Derek Chauvin, the former Minneapolis police officer charged with second-degree murder in Floyd's death, is in fact “Cash Cab” host Ben Bailey.
Tocky on 25/6/2020 at 03:42
Quote Posted by nbohr1more
It may look like a lot but it's only a top 100.
These are the most important:
Hillary Clinton took money from and supported nations that she KNEW funded ISIS and terrorists
(
http://wikileaks.org/podesta-emails/emailid/3774)
This is bigger than any RICO case you could imagine.
It is hard to even fathom how they would tackle prosecutions since so many in law enforcement or executive positions are involved.
I read the first "proof" and there was nothing backing up the aligation he posted directly above it. My guess is that this works with Republicans because they never read anything.
It was however nice to read an email where a leader actually understood a situation and made suggestions using information. It gave me that old timey feeling of folks in government knowing more than street bums with personality disorders.
