Jeshibu on 17/6/2020 at 20:57
Quote Posted by nbohr1more
Your "team" (favored political party) just killed 400k people with a bioweapon and all you can muster is "fuck off".
Whatever...
Believe your SNL, Colbert, and Late Nite Jimmy news casters.
Bold claim from a CIA undercover operative.
nbohr1more on 18/6/2020 at 05:40
Quote Posted by Sulphur
I don't have a team, genius. I'm not even a US citizen.
Congratulations on discovering something we all did as kids, though: the concept of six degrees of separation.
Also, you can continue rubbing yourself off in public without my help. You qualitatively fail to meet the requirements for intelligent conversation, so I'm signing out.
Your copious political ranting in the "Trump Dump" thread proves otherwise.
I have never once seen you post anything that doesn't align with the "left wing team narrative".
You start a big holy-war about the fact that I don't trust one source due to anecdotal experiences because "not trusting" that site
is a sign of political insubordination and wrong-think.
lowenz on 18/6/2020 at 06:02
Is there any possibility for a human remaining "socially sane&functional" to avoid "social-oriented&engineered narratives" ? :p
You know, I mean something like X*Y=constant
It's really not possible, man. It's not how the mind is designed by evolution (to avoid narratives 'cause narratives are essential in human interaction and so reproduction, scientific ones too of course: "scientific truths" are by consensus and praxis, not by a divine "objectivity" nobody today believes in).
Political teams simply discovered this long time ago and use it everyday.
It's why an intelligent person like you can socially drift and it's not a good thing, in particular if you want to expose the "dynamics of the truth".
Thirith on 18/6/2020 at 09:58
Quote Posted by heywood
We have to stop responding to this inanity.
Honestly, this is an issue I find very difficult. What's better: just ignoring such in(s)anity, and then it stands unopposed and without context, or doing what Sulphur tried and at least making a statement? A lack of reaction can be read as many different things by later readers. In the absence of stronger moderation, should we be more vocal in opposing this kind of rubbish, or is that pointless and/or unnecessary?
lowenz on 18/6/2020 at 10:26
Why "opposing" and not "refocusing" ? - the virus "origin" is not the problem (and the origin is pretty natural, no engineered weapon kills so indirectly like SARS2) so simply refocus on the real problem every time the "conspiracy approach" jumps out :p
faetal on 18/6/2020 at 13:28
Waek up sheoples - the left wing narrative, the deep state, HOOLARY CLONTONS EMAILS.
nbohr - you can just C&P the above as responses from now on to save time.
You're welcome.
heywood on 18/6/2020 at 14:29
Quote Posted by Thirith
Honestly, this is an issue I find very difficult. What's better: just ignoring such in(s)anity, and then it stands unopposed and without context, or doing what Sulphur tried and at least making a statement? A lack of reaction can be read as many different things by later readers. In the absence of stronger moderation, should we be more vocal in opposing this kind of rubbish, or is that pointless and/or unnecessary?
I don't think that loony conspiracy theories posted in the off-topic forum of a legacy gaming site visited by a small number of old regulars is going to influence anybody. I also think by continuing to debate it, we encourage more and more of it, and thus amplify the nonsense.
It can also hijack threads and fill them with pages and pages of noise. Fortunately, nbohr1more doesn't crank out posts at machine gun speed like jkcerda did.
Thirith on 18/6/2020 at 15:01
Oh, I don't worry about people being influenced by the verbal sewage. I worry about people coming here, looking at a thread or two and saying, "Ooookay, here be cranks..." and leaving again. Or (and possibly worse) looking at the idiocy and deciding that this is their kind of people.
PigLick on 18/6/2020 at 16:19
this is kinda how imagine comm chat atm, poetic license of course[video=youtube;tFwsQd-07Yw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFwsQd-07Yw[/video]
PigLick on 18/6/2020 at 16:23
and of course we cant have this conversation without mentiong Jeff fucking Bezos that swindler
[video=youtube;knury0Na1pQ]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knury0Na1pQ&t=1s[/video]