heywood on 7/10/2021 at 13:11
Bannon is talking about having a standing army of future Republican civil servants pre-screened, pre-selected, and pre-trained, so the next Republican President can replace the whole political leadership of every department within days of taking office. Trump didn't take transition seriously, so his administration got off to the slowest start since Bill Clinton. Bannon learned a lesson from that. He's not talking about an actual coup, he's talking about expediting the replacement of appointees so that you don't have a bunch of leftover Democrats in department leadership positions resisting your agenda after you take office.
lowenz on 7/10/2021 at 18:07
"shocktroopers" taking the state nexus is really SS-like :v
Cipheron on 8/10/2021 at 05:01
Quote Posted by lowenz
"shocktroopers" taking the state nexus is really SS-like :v
The SS is probably the best comparison there.
(
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/jeffrey-burnham-killed-pharmacist-brother-covid-vaccine-shots-poisoning/)
Quote:
A Maryland man charged in the deaths of his brother, sister-in-law and another woman may have killed his brother, a pharmacist, because the brother was administering COVID-19 vaccines, charging documents show, according to CBS Washington, D.C. affiliate WUSA-TV.
Jeffrey Burnham, 46, of Cumberland, "wanted to confront" his brother "with the government poisoning people with COVID vaccines," one document reads, adding, "He repeatedly stated, 'Brian knows something!'"
nbohr1more on 14/10/2021 at 05:40
(
https://spectator.org/john-durham-and-the-amazing-disappearing-dnc-hack/)
Bill Binney will be vindicated.
Justin Henry ( Crowdstrike CEO ) relented regarding the certainty of the DNC hack but also revealed that
Perkins Coie "
prevented Crowdstrike from divulging all their forensics to the FBI".
Would the DNC do this to limit their legal risks regarding negligence in info security?
Hardly.
Why hide data protection issues from the FBI (etc) when they are already "admitted to" in the leaked messages?
Ask yourself this:
"How hard would it be to frame an unpopular figure like Trump if there were no contradicting evidence?"
Do you honestly believe he would have escaped impeachment conviction if his legal team didn't have convincing proof that the "DNC hack" was "not a hack"?
Perkins Coie knows... Perkins Coie knows...
Inline Image:
https://s.abcnews.com/images/Politics/HT_seth_rich_jef_160711_4x3_992.jpg
Cipheron on 14/10/2021 at 09:29
He's an idiot
Overview:
(
https://www.computerweekly.com/news/252445769/Briton-ran-pro-Kremlin-disinformation-campaign-that-helped-Trump-deny-Russian-links)
> The document, rewritten for propaganda effect, was published three weeks later and claimed to be the work of a new fake personality called Forensicator, which claimed that stolen DNC documents were copied to a computer located in the eastern US. If correct, it was devastating news for US intelligence - because it cleared the Russians.
> Some former intelligence officials, from a group called Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), backed up the claim. A group, including William Binney, a former technical director at the US National Security Agency (NSA), and former CIA officer Ray McGovern, were persuaded, without checking the file data, to say that the hacking was the work of insiders.
So, the Forensicator report is the basis of what Binney wrote, and others say that Binney is an idiot who didn't even *look* at the data.
the response is that they're bad-mouthing Binney, Binney's a genius right?
However, the Forensicator account itself called Binney an idiot who can't properly assess the evidence as soon as Binney said something Forensicator didn't agree with:
(
https://theforensicator.wordpress.com/2019/06/07/the-campbell-coincidence/)
>> Binney agreed: “It's clear Guccifer 2 is messing with the data. Everything Guccifer 2 says is suspect and needs to be proven by other sources/means. I agree there is no evidence to prove where the download/copy was done.”
> We respect Binney and the VIPS for all they have done to demonstrate inconsistencies in the Russian hacking narrative and we support their call to have all unanswered questions thoroughly investigated. Here, however, we think that Binney accepted Campbell's “tampering” theory too quickly.
So Binney bought into the Forensicator "report", but other people said Binney was gullible and didn't properly assess the information. However, when pressed, Binney admitted there's no evidence - only to be called gullible *by Forensicator*.
It's kind of obvious that Binney is being played here - they played into his biases and preoccupations, to put him as the unwitting pawn in their propaganda. He hasn't done even surface-level fact checking at any point in this debacle, they just want his name attached.
Briareos H on 14/10/2021 at 11:09
As a non-American, I wonder how relevant that kind of development is to the greater picture anyway. Political parties are conspiratorial in nature and every single of them is built on lies and omission, the DNC doesn't seem immune to that -- I'm willing to bet there was shady dealings to block Bernie Sanders, for example.
That doesn't change a thing to the mountain of actual proof that Trump and his cronies are some of the worse people to be put in charge of a country, lying and manipulating at an unprecedented rate and bringing the image of American society as a role model for human progress from a state of steady decline to a state of absolute farce in the span of just a few years.
I'm truly perplexed by the fact that (genuine) Trump and Q supporters alike are seemingly waiting for a single thread to unravel the web of lies that obscures some sort of dark universal truth going on with Democrats, They Live-style.
lowenz on 14/10/2021 at 18:19
Quote Posted by Briareos H
Political parties are conspiratorial in nature and every single of them is built on lies and omission,
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh :D
Cipheron on 14/10/2021 at 18:51
Quote Posted by Briareos H
I'm truly perplexed by the fact that (genuine) Trump and Q supporters alike are seemingly waiting for a single thread to unravel the web of lies that obscures some sort of dark universal truth going on with Democrats, They Live-style.
The whole Q narrative relies on the enemy being absolute masters of manipulation: they can disappear 800,000 American children a year without leaving a trace, no mass graves, nothing. Google "800,000 children per year abducted cabal" for the articles. The total US birthrate is 3.2 million children per year, so 800,000 per year is a quarter of the entire population. So if this is true then 1/4 of all children you went to school with should be being abducted by The Cabal by graduation. And they apparently do this all the time without alerting or involving the police or military.
Yet at the same time they're the Democrats, who we are also aware are comically incompetent at organizing anything or keeping a secret.
Also, they somehow vanish 1 in 4 of the entire population without drawing any attention yet somehow they can't organize an incident such as a car accident for someone like Alex Jones? The very fact that someone like Alex is still walking and talking is the proof that the Alex Jones conspiracies aren't in fact true.
Nicker on 14/10/2021 at 19:58
Unless they are also building an incompetence defense into their mega conspiracy. Or they want to implicate Jones...
And when I say, they, I mean They.
Pyrian on 14/10/2021 at 22:15
An individual non-binary person?