Starker on 12/1/2025 at 03:25
I'd never have thought US would become a country that so desperately needs to humiliate its friends and appease its enemies.
RippedPhreak on 12/1/2025 at 04:06
Pointing out Trudeau's failures is not the same thing as attacking Canada as a whole. Secondly the US first needs to get back on its feet economically. Now is not the time to swagger around picking new fights and starting new wars. How is this "appeasement?"
Starker on 12/1/2025 at 06:09
You are attacking Canada as a whole. As is Lord Dampnut. Saying that the US needs nothing from Canada (when you obviously and provably do) is not saying that the US needs nothing from Trudeau. Calling Canadians names is not pointing out Trudeau's failings. Starting a trade war with Canada is not starting a trade war with Trudeau.
Attempting to appease dictators with imperial fantasies is going to cost the US far more in the long run. Why would you want Russia to win in the Ukraine? Why would you want Russia to become strong by using Ukraine's resources and manpower? How exactly does it benefit the US? Russia will never be friends with the US as long as it has imperial ambitions and no amount of trying to be friends, no amount of trying to prevent Ukraine from defending themselves is going to change that.
Also, not picking fights? Threatening to invade Panama, threatening to invade Greenland, threatening to bomb Mexico, threatening to unleash hell in Gaza? What is that if not picking fights? What is waging economic wars with Europe and Canada, if not picking fights? Also, what the hell would you call assassinating a foreign country's general if not picking a fight?
lowenz on 12/1/2025 at 09:22
And why, you trads, accept that the incel/redpill/traditionalistic movements are nothing more than a russian/chinese IMMIGRATION agenda tool? You fight immigration on american soil but you say nothing about emigration of the "traitors" (using a word you love sooooooo much).
Why a trad emigrating to Russia or China is NOT a "traitor" when Russia and China are not afraid to call their own "traitors" if they want to escape hell?
Did you never open YouTube and how is fucking full of "Why emigration from USA is the only salvation for real men" videos? Did you never think that all the "woke/libtard existential danger" story is just a way to convince fools to bring manpower to Russia and China at ZERO cost with just the russian/eastern pussy bait?
"Here you can be a REAL MAN!!!1111, not in USA, not anymore, that decadent wokist country of libtard zombies"
How can you be so blind? How can you be so WEAK in mind and determination accusing the "wokes" to be the cunts?
Just open YT and do basic maths. It's in front of your eyes what's the simple project of Russia and China, literally in the YT recommandations.....and you call that "a new hope", ahah!
They're using your self-inflicted desperation - it's a byproduct of the american dream paradigma - to catch you like a fish and the "anti-woke" propaganda is the net.
It's just there to see if you open your brilliant mind......
lowenz on 12/1/2025 at 12:04
To canadians of the forums
"Antiwoke / antimainstream" canadian (? please check the language if real canadian, I don't think so, he doens't talk like a canadian but maybe he's a russian returned from Canada to fight in the war) fighting for Putin:
[video=youtube;-KsZEd7t2jM]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-KsZEd7t2jM&ab_channel=RealReporter[/video]
If canadian (as a regular citizen no matter the origin), why this guy is "just a free man fighting for what he believes" and not a "damn traitor" to us westerners?
Why we just don't apply the same russian value system that antiwoke/antimainstream americans love so much (and so kill him)?
Why we don't consider the "antiwokes" the inside-enemy like they factually are? Just because they tell patriotic fairytales?
RippedPhreak on 12/1/2025 at 13:38
Quote:
Fixed with MAGA-compliant attitude toward the "strong men" that "really knows how things work" and let you serve them.
I state that I think Poilievre will probably be a better leader for Canada than Trudeau, and you say it's only because I want to serve a strongman? This is such a weird non-sequitur that I have no idea what universe you're in, or are you just trolling? Your next two posts are nothing but word salad as well, unworthy of any response.
Quote:
You are attacking Canada as a whole. As is Lord Dampnut.
I personally mock the more liberal Canadians, sure but I'm not the president. No, Trump is not mocking Canada, but Trudeau. And it seems Canadians are also not thrilled with Trudeau because he is resigning. Starker lie count: 1
Quote:
Attempting to appease dictators with imperial fantasies is going to cost the US far more in the long run. Why would you want Russia to win in the Ukraine? Why would you want Russia to become strong by using Ukraine's resources and manpower?
I don't want Russia to win. I just don't care about either Russia or Ukraine. As you
already know. So I don't know why you keep repeating this, unless you are posturing for some imagined audience. Starker lie count: 2. As for imperial fantasies, Putin is welcome to try and attack Poland, Germany, France etc. It would end for him the same way it ended for Hitler.
Quote:
Russia will never be friends with the US as long as it has imperial ambitions and no amount of trying to be friends, no amount of trying to prevent Ukraine from defending themselves is going to change that.
A, I don't care about Russia's friendship. B, Who is trying to prevent Ukraine from defending itself? Starker lie count: 3. Ukraine is welcome to defend itself all it wants. I just don't want to pay it hundreds of billions of my tax dollars per year to do so. Especially when much of that money seems to be nothing but a money laundering scheme to circle back into US politicians' pockets.
Quote:
Threatening to invade Panama, threatening to invade Greenland, threatening to bomb Mexico, threatening to unleash hell in Gaza?
Trump wants favorable shipping terms in Panama, that is all. The Greenlanders are already signaling that they are open to negotiation to becoming a US territory. The Mexican government should be happy that someone wants to help them deal with the cartels, which is all Trump has threatened to do. Some of the hostages held by Hamas apparently have American citizenship, so taking some action to get them released seems proper, unless you just think we should uh...APPEASE Hamas instead? Starker lie count: 6
Quote:
Also, what the hell would you call assassinating a foreign country's general if not picking a fight?
If Soleimani was involved in orchestrating the big attack on the US embassy in Baghdad, then killing him was entirely correct and proper. You should be glad a man of judicious restraint was president at that time. Bush or Obama would have bombed a few buildings full of civilians and called it a day. Killing one guy (and presumably his aide and/or driver) sends the right message to Iran's government,
without indiscriminate murder of random Iranians. Or perhaps you'd prefer we APPEASE Iran as Obama did, by sending them pallets of cash?
lowenz on 12/1/2025 at 14:19
Quote Posted by RippedPhreak
This is such a weird non-sequitur
Trudeau is attacked just like Zelensky because there's the strong man (Trump/Putin) that says to you "he must be replaced, it's a non-negotiable condition to talk". The same for "He's a libtard/he's a drug addict/he's ***" -> place whatever can be used to hit someone's reputation
In this you serve the strongman score, you repeat the same scheme they propose to you like a reveletion/intuition/precondition and you don't realise they're using you like a repeater to generate more consensus.
It's how the "strongman" becomes more strong apart from initially pretending to be strong: they're hijacking your need to find a target to hit and then direct your arguments.
I'm absolutely not trolling, maybe you, I hope.
lowenz on 12/1/2025 at 14:42
Quote Posted by RippedPhreak
If Soleimani was involved in orchestrating the big attack on the US embassy in Baghdad
No proofs about this ever emerged.
It was killed because someone asked Trump the favour, after luring him in Iraq.
Nicker on 12/1/2025 at 15:14
Quote:
Trump wants favorable shipping terms in Panama, that is all. The Greenlanders are already signaling that they are open to negotiation to becoming a US territory. The Mexican government should be happy that someone wants to help them deal with the cartels, which is all Trump has threatened to do.
Let's see... one lie, two lies, three lies. Well done. There's a place in Trump's Cabinet of Minions waiting for you.
BTW, Poilievre is poised to sell Canada out to Trump. As awful as Trudeau is, PeePee is far worse.
RippedPhreak on 12/1/2025 at 17:29
Oh but I thought you said Canada was our good friend? How can Poilievre "sell you out" to the US then?
