Cipheron on 3/3/2022 at 09:20
Quote Posted by Pyrian
Honestly... Yeah? It's another front on which we thought Russia was more robust than it actually is.
It is a little surprising.
*70%* of accounts putting likes or retweets on the official GOP twitter account were Russians? That's more than I would have expected, though in hindsight, interaction with the official *party* Twitter account seems pretty "non organic". For example, how many Democrats even directly engaging with the Joe Biden twitter account or the DNC twitter account? It's just not the normal thing you do.
I would have expected some drop-off, but not so much and not clustered in the center of the GOP rather than the QAnon fringes. Just goes to show, huh.
EDIT: also, goddamn this one:
(
https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2022/03/unvaccinated-seals-navy-trump-judge-ukraine-russia.html)
Quote:
On Monday, the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals issued a stunning decision transferring control over the Navy's special operations forces from the commander in chief to a single federal judge in Texas. The 5th Circuit's decision marks an astonishing infringement of President Joe Biden's constitutional authority over the nation's armed forces, directing him to follow the instructions of an unelected judge—rather than his own admirals—in deploying SEALs. High-ranking military personnel have testified under oath that this power grab constitutes a direct threat to the Navy's operational abilities. As Russia invades Ukraine and declares a nuclear alert, Donald Trump's judges are actively threatening America's national security.
Like so many lawless cases in the 5th Circuit, this dispute began in the courtroom of U.S. District Judge Reed O'Connor. A notorious George W. Bush nominee, O'Connor is best known for attempting to abolish the Affordable Care Act in 2018, then getting reversed by a 7-2 vote at the Supreme Court last year. So when 35 Navy Special Warfare service members refused to comply with Biden's COVID-19 vaccine mandate for the armed forces, they brought their case to O'Connor. These service members—mostly SEALs, all represented by the far-right First Liberty Institute—claimed that their religious beliefs barred them from getting the shots. (Some said they heard “divine instruction not to receive the vaccine”; others asserted that the mRNA vaccines altered “the divine creation of their body by unnaturally inducing production of spike proteins.”)
O'Connor predictably sided against Biden in January, granting a preliminary injunction of staggering scope on the grounds that the mandate violates the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. He awarded himself sweeping authority over the assignment of the plaintiffs, forcing the Navy to deploy them with operational units. When several plaintiffs were denied transfer to a duty station, they asked O'Connor to sanction the government for allegedly violating his order; he promptly ordered the Justice Department to explain why it should not be punished for failing to deploy these service members. (O'Connor has not yet decided whether to impose sanctions.)
As of today, this lone judge continues to oversee the plaintiffs' assignments, forcing the Navy to train, equip, and deploy unvaccinated troops—with granular specificity as to their exact stations and duties.
Never before in the history of the United States has one district court judge exercised so much control over the armed forces. The Constitution assigns this authority to Congress and the president. There are certainly legal limits on executive discretion, including due process and constitutional safeguards against invidious discrimination. Right-wing lawyers have typically been loath to acknowledge any restrictions on the president's war powers. Indeed, the conservative legal movement has endorsed a near-limitless vision of the commander in chief: Republican presidents, lawyers, and judges have argued that the Constitution allows the president to deploy troops without congressional approval, indefinitely detain enemy combatants, and exclude entire classes of immigrants from the country. But now it seems they draw the line at a simple vaccine requirement—even though all service members were already required to have at least nine vaccines upon enlistment.
lowenz on 6/3/2022 at 12:09
Quote Posted by Cipheron
QAnon fringes
Nuts don't need help from Russia being nuts.
Pyrian on 6/3/2022 at 18:39
Even Russian disinformation trolls are like "What is wrong with these people!?"
Cipheron on 21/3/2022 at 21:19
In a time when Putin's thugs are going door to door rounding up Donestsk men to send to the Front in Ukraine:
(
https://www.salon.com/2022/03/21/pro-group-sent-armed-members-door-to-door-in-colorado-to-intimidate-voters/)
Quote:
The lawsuit alleges that the U.S. Election Integrity Plan — led by Shawn Smith, an ally of former Trump strategist Steve Bannon and MyPillow founder Mike Lindell — is sending armed members door-to-door in areas with large numbers of voters of color, questioning people about how they voted and taking photographs of their homes.
...
"Defendants' objectives are clear. By planning to, threatening to, and actually deploying armed agents to knock on doors throughout the state of Colorado, USEIP is engaged in voter intimidation," the lawsuit states. "USEIP's public-facing actions are a clear signal to Colorado voters — especially voters of color — that to vote in an upcoming election means facing interrogation by potentially armed and threatening USEIP agents at their doorstep thereafter."
The lawsuit claims that some members have worn "badges" and falsely accused voters of fraud.
"Sometimes armed and donning badges to present an appearance of government officiality, USEIP agents interrogate voters about their addresses, whether they participated in the 2020 election, and — if so — how they cast their vote," the complaint says. "It is reported that multiple agents have claimed to be from 'the county,' and have, without any evidence, falsely accused the residents of casting fraudulent ballots."
The voting rights groups say the group's efforts to seek out areas where they believe voter fraud occurred has largely focused on high-density housing areas and communities experiencing a growth in the number of minority voters.
Nicker on 26/3/2022 at 05:01
"At least it can't get any worse," he said, knowing the exact opposite was true.
Virginia Thomas, wife of SCOTUS Justice, Clarence (The Groper) Thomas, was exposed as an active insurrectionist, in emails to Mark Meadows, which her husband voted to keep hidden from the January 6th Committee.
After a reply in which Meadows invoked the aid of the King of Kings (Jesus), she thanked Meadows for his encouraging words.
Quote:
The follow messages were also exchanged on Nov. 24, the Post reported.
Meadows: “This is a fight of good versus evil. Evil always looks like the victor until the King of Kings triumphs. Do not grow weary in well doing. The fight continues. I have staked my career on it. Well at least my time in DC on it.”
Thomas: “Thank you!! Needed that! This plus a conversation with my best friend just now... I will try to keep holding on. America is worth it!”
I wonder who that "best friend" might have been. A certain Justice of the Supreme Court, perhaps?
Glen Kirschner lays it out.
[video=youtube;P6RnYBw5z0g]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P6RnYBw5z0g[/video]
Starker on 26/3/2022 at 05:43
How stochastic terrorism works:
Quote:
(
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/24/donald-trump-sues-hillary-clinton-and-allies-russia-00020174)
Former President Donald Trump is suing 2016 Democratic Presidential nominee Hillary Clinton in a sprawling case that accuses her of conspiring with dozens of other actors — frequent targets of Trump's conspiracy theories and rage — to topple his presidency.
[...]
In the public docket for the case, Trump's attorneys included the home addresses of the vast majority of the defendants in the suit. For Trump, however, they listed the address of Ticktin's law firm.
Nicker on 30/3/2022 at 03:15
Judge David Carter released a finding on Monday. "Based on the evidence, the Court finds it more likely than not that President Trump corruptly attempted to obstruct the Joint Session of Congress on January 6, 2021,"
This preponderance of the evidence, is sufficient burden of proof to indict someone. More importantly, it far exceeds the burden required to arrest someone. That would be probable cause. The grounds to arrest Donny Small Hands has been met by a country mile.
Glenn Kirschner explains.
[video=youtube;LtQe4goeXEA]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LtQe4goeXEA[/video]
Nicker on 30/3/2022 at 03:52
Woopsie! It gets worse, of course.
In a TV interview with Real America Voice, T***p asks Putin to release Russian dirt on Biden.
[video=youtube;yr3HuVISobg]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yr3HuVISobg[/video]
(
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/29/trump-putin-hunter-biden-00021223) Here's a print version of the same story.
Cue
The Projectionist.
Quote:
Trump has repeatedly promoted dubious claims of foreign business dealings by Hunter Biden, specifically alleging that he received millions of dollars from the wife of Moscow's late mayor, Yury Luzhkov.
“She gave him $3.5 million so now I would think Putin would know the answer to that. I think he should release it,” Trump said in the interview, conducted at his Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida. “I think we should know that answer.”
Trump failed to mention that he himself sought to do business with Luzhkov's government in the late 1990s, according to POLITICO. Trump also was pursuing high-profile real estate deals in Russia as recently as 2016, including a proposed Trump Tower Moscow.
demagogue on 30/3/2022 at 03:54
I think it was obvious that obstruction was going to be his biggest vulnerability from practically the first month he took office. There were already close to a dozen viable charges which the Mueller report walked through, some of them consisting of multiple repeated attempts that could stand alone--so I think it's better to count them as several dozen (and note that most of those were only within the first year or two; I'm sure if another report had been done after the end of his term they'd have dug up another dozen or more)--and some of them legal slam dunk convictions but for an openly corrupt AG (in the opinion of the American Bar Ass'n, not just like my random opinion) that declined to prosecute (or allow a post-admin prosecution), and of course we saw how the first impeachment handled them. It's a wonder it's had to take this long to get to this point on a viable obstruction charge on the guy, and I still worry it goes nowhere.