Tocky on 9/2/2020 at 17:46
Quote Posted by jkcerda
HOW are we supposed to "drain the swamp" IF you only put people with "experience" who are part of the swamp?
So venal sycophantic fools who know nothing and can be trained by corporate overlords without any of that nasty prior knowledge of actual governance are a better fit? BRILLIANT!
Also is it good or bad that I don't know what a monody is?
Renzatic on 9/2/2020 at 17:59
Quote Posted by Tocky
Also is it good or bad that I don't know what a monody is?
According to Google, it's a song of lament for the dead.
jkcerda on 9/2/2020 at 19:47
Quote Posted by Tocky
So venal sycophantic fools who know nothing and can be trained by corporate overlords without any of that nasty prior knowledge of actual governance are a better fit? BRILLIANT!
Also is it good or bad that I don't know what a monody is?
liberals, "drain the swamp"
also liberals. " how DARE You hire from outside the swamp".
Tony_Tarantula on 9/2/2020 at 20:08
I'm putting (a bit) of my money where my mouth is:
[IMG]
Inline Image:
https://i.imgur.com/IaGj7Hl.png[/IMG]
Technically it's just a bet so it's not insider trading. What I'm hearing now is that if things don't work out they'll draft Hillary at the convention. I outlined back in April or so last year why there's good reason to believe Pete has substantial insider backing.
My own personal assessment leads me to believe it's Pete due to the rather unusual number of shady power players backing him (e.g. Franklin Leonard and David Axelrod), the typical "insider" resume, the rather bizarre circumstance where a political nobody somehow gets fawning coverage from literally every major establishment talk show and paper, and here in NYC there have been some meetings I know about where he has the backing of major Wall Street power players. Now in Iowa there was some fairly obvious fraud going on to help him win the vote in Iowa (note: he announced his victory BEFORE results were released).
HOWEVER I've also been tipped off that the DNC is considering nominating Hillary via draft at the convention if the delegates are split. Given the source I'm taking the possibility seriously.
By splitting 50/50 at those odds you literally can't lose between the two of them.
Renzatic on 9/2/2020 at 20:22
Quote Posted by jkcerda
liberals, "drain the swamp"
also liberals. " how DARE You hire from outside the swamp".
No one's bitching about hiring people from outside of Washington, it's about hiring dipshits who aren't qualified for the jobs they're being given, simply because they're friends with Trump.
Should we make Trump's hairdresser Secretary of State next, just because she's a people person with a GRRRRREAT ASS (I'm watching Heat)?
Quote Posted by Tony_Tarantula
HOWEVER I've also been tipped off that the DNC is considering nominating Hillary via draft at the convention if the delegates are split. Given the source I'm taking the possibility seriously.
I very seriously doubt that. The Iowa caucus is already a clusterfuck of a shitstorm that the usual suspects are already drumming up as a conspiracy theory. Not only would throwing Hillary into the mix make the theorists look right, giving them more ammo for later, but it'd be political suicide all around.
Renzatic on 9/2/2020 at 20:46
Think about all the people in Trump's inner circle who have gone to prison since he took the presidency. I'd say he's done a damn fine job of draining the swamp.
jkcerda on 9/2/2020 at 21:05
Quote Posted by Renzatic
Think about all the people in Trump's inner circle who have gone to prison since he took the presidency. I'd say he's done a damn fine job of draining the swamp.
there you go, mission accomplished :p
Renzatic on 9/2/2020 at 21:45
Woot?
jkcerda on 9/2/2020 at 21:50
TRUMP Promised to drain the swamp, his people went to jail, so swamp drained as he promised, mission accomplished....... also see retards GW bush version of mission accomplished..
