David on 11/4/2005 at 20:08
You were so very close to getting one, but you had to spoil it by calming down >;D
MsLedd on 12/4/2005 at 01:48
I can ban you now if you'd like a retroactive "time-out"... just let me know. :cheeky:
broken on 15/4/2005 at 03:36
awww... do it, Ms L. just for a moment. :ebil:
JACKofTrades on 16/4/2005 at 13:53
Bans just prevent someone from posting, right? Is it technically possible (or even feasible) for a ban to prevent a person from even viewing the site?
David on 16/4/2005 at 14:06
Yes, it is. And yes, we do on occasion.
Kolya on 18/4/2005 at 20:42
Quote Posted by David
We have issued temp bans where it has been deemed necessary, although these have been given out recently to people who could do with taking a break from the forums for a while rather than outright rule breaking.
You mean you ban people for medical reasons?
Like: "Jeez, he's been online for 50h straight. Give it a break buddy!"
You are superconsiderate! :)
Kolya
TheNightTerror on 18/4/2005 at 20:49
:laff::laff: I've been online for 50 hours straight before, I never got banned. What's up with that? :joke:
Lytha on 19/4/2005 at 11:44
Quote Posted by PigLick
Women are changeable. Thats the lesson.
I think the lesson is more like: when other people say that someone "has said" something, it's not always the truth. :P
JACKofTrades on 4/5/2005 at 22:46
I just saw a new thread today in comm chat where someone got banned after their very first post. This has got me curious because none of the posters after the bannee (new word? :cheeky: ) reacted to his post in any way. The only explanation I can come up with is that the person was already banned and tried to register an alt?
