Abu Musab al-Zarqawi = worm food... - by SlyFoxx
Parker'sSire on 14/6/2006 at 02:55
Quote Posted by Mingan
The successor to Zarqawi is... *rolls drums*
...Abu Hamza al-Mouhajer!
ah!! ...al-Qaeda... Iraq
(hang on a minute...)
... (ponder)
.......(ponder)
...
(ponder)...
...Scumbag!!!!
(wait a second...I'm rushing things... he's still alive)
Fingernail on 14/6/2006 at 08:19
peace be upon him :idea:
paloalto on 14/6/2006 at 16:27
May he be in a lot of pieces.
jermi on 14/6/2006 at 16:40
Note how the media uses words like "successor" to perpetuate the (CIA originated) view that al-Qaeda is an actual hierarchical organization.
SD on 14/6/2006 at 16:42
Every major power needs a bogeyman. You think they would have killed al-Zarqawi if they didn't have another lined up to step into his shoes? ;)
Agent Monkeysee on 14/6/2006 at 19:35
Quote Posted by jermi
Note how the media uses words like "successor" to perpetuate the (CIA originated) view that al-Qaeda is an actual hierarchical organization.
What else would you call him :confused:
I agree that the vision of Al Queda is a little too Fortress of Doom to match reality but if the guy's taking over what Zarqawi did then he's his successor. You don't need an organizational apparatus to use the word.
paloalto on 14/6/2006 at 23:29
Quote Posted by Strontium Dog
Every major power needs a bogeyman. You think they would have killed al-Zarqawi if they didn't have another lined up to step into his shoes? ;)
As do men like Osama,not just the superpowers,or anyone who wants to drive a wedge between groups for their own purposes.He tolerated us when we were putting weapons in his hands to fight the Soviets in Afghanistan.But not after the Soviets left.He needs enemies to drive his terrorism and his desire to put the Caliphate back in the seat of power.
SD on 14/6/2006 at 23:46
So you're saying people like Osama bin Laden are terrorists for terrorism's sake, and that the cause is largely irrelevant, save for a desire to restore the Caliphate?
Well, the day is a mere 46 minutes old, but I will eat my stereo if I hear anything more retarded in the remaining 23 hours and 14 minutes of it.
Pyrian on 14/6/2006 at 23:50
Quote Posted by Malygris
...scumbags in life are scumbags in death...
Scumbags in life are inanimate objects in death. Each corpse is no more deserving of respect or scorn than any other pile of decomposing organic matter. :erg:
metal dawn on 15/6/2006 at 00:24
Quote Posted by Pyrian
Scumbags in life are inanimate objects in death. Each corpse is no more deserving of respect or scorn than any other pile of decomposing organic matter. :erg:
Just because a person's dead does not mean they are free from scorn or despising. They can be just as deserving of it.
A few cases in point:
Saloth Sar (AKA Tol Sot or Pol Pot)
Adolf Hitler
Joseph Stalin
Not exactly the same thing, I know, but still...
