Queue on 28/3/2013 at 14:59
So get this...
Quote:
A high school science teacher in Idaho is under investigation by the state's professional standards commission because he reportedly used the word “vagina” during a biology lesson.
What in the fuck, right? I mean, seriously. How dare he say "vagina" during a biology lesson about the female anatomy. He could have said something like "twat", or "gash", or "cunny"; or even "ugly taco", or "Karl Rove". But "vagina"? NEVER!
Quote:
Tim McDaniel, who teaches 10th grade science at Dietrich School, told the Twin Falls Times-News that four parents were upset when they learned that his lesson included the word “vagina” and information about the biology behind female orgasm.
Now some of you
liberals are going to be outraged, saying that these four parents are clearly out of their collective minds--that, how could anyone with a gram of intelligence be offended by a technical term used during a science lesson, or a natural human sexual occurrence? But I say that these four are true patriots; protecting America not only from terrorists, but from words that cannot be found in the Bible--you know, God's Dictionary. And the Bible says nothing about Jesus having an orgasm. Now, if the "teacher" had of called the awful thing "wicked" or "Sodomite", we'd be all set. But vagina is man's term. The education system in this country is failing anD I SWEAR IT'S GOING TO LEAD US ON A PATH TO COMMUNISM AND DAMNATION! This is what happens when Obama tries to run the government...look it up....
But, being God's democracy, what do you think? Should teacher's be allowed to teach such horrible things as human anatomy in 10th grade biology in a rational and adult manner, or should we just preemptively stone all teachers in case they might try to educate? You decide. (
http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/03/27/idaho-teacher-investigated-for-saying-vagina-during-biology-lesson/) Full Story
...and may God have mercy on your soul.
Vasquez on 28/3/2013 at 17:07
You also can't say "rectum" when teaching about female anatomy, because women don't poo.
N'Al on 28/3/2013 at 17:49
Quote Posted by Vasquez
women don't poo.
THIS is the reason I come to TTLG. To learn.
Queue on 28/3/2013 at 17:53
You didn't know that, N'Al? Man, I thought everyone knew that women store it all in a secret pouch, then eventually explode around the age of 50. And all that poo gets scattered and goes back into the Earth, so all the flowers can grow.
Circle of life, my friend. Circle of life.
Nicker on 28/3/2013 at 19:47
I am a Liberal(TM) and I endorse freedom of repression.
pavlovscat on 28/3/2013 at 20:22
Quote Posted by Vasquez
You also can't say "rectum" when teaching about female anatomy, because women don't poo.
My husband says this is only true of single women. They do not poo or fart. Once they get married, they magically grow an asshole, and this is one of the great mysteries of life.
SubJeff on 29/3/2013 at 01:45
I think that its fine. Fire the teacher, move him to another school. On the proviso that those kids of those parents are banned from school, university and any other institute of learning. And ban the kids of those kids too. These genes must never ever be allowed to reach a position in life where the owners can have any real power. If any of the kids, of their kids, attain jobs where they will be in charge of any decisions that may affect anyone else's life to a significant degree the process will have failed and every member of the family will have to be liquidated.
Peanuckle on 29/3/2013 at 02:09
False outrage aside, the school should support the teacher and explain to the parents that these are things that people need to know in today's world. Covering your ears and pretending that kids don't know about sex leads to kids having dangerous sex because you never taught them about protection.
You never really hear news out of Idaho anyways. I bet they're just pushing this issue so that people read the headlines and go "Oh, that's right, Idaho is a state. Huh, neat!"
