fett on 20/2/2007 at 14:20
In the continuing mystery that is my educational pursuit, I'm currently adding some credits to my degree which will enable me to work as a librarian. I'm concentrating on school library studies which would allow me to work in public libraries or (preferably for me) in an elementary school library.
This is not a thread seeking career advice.
No my friends, this is a thread about the apparent inability on the part of storytellers to come up with endings. Note, I did not say 'good' endings (as that is a subjective term).
As part of my studies, I've taken it upon myself to catch up on young people's literature. Young adult fantasy has always been my favorite genre of literature as well, because it's all the wonder, with none (or very little) of the cynicism. I've always loved Narnia, Alice, Lloyd Alexander, etc.
So I've read the Harry Potter series to date, as well as several other series (Gregor the Overlander, Charlie Bone, Artemis Fowl, Pullman's series, etc.). I also just finished Lemony Snickett's 'A Series of Unfortunate Events' which at long last brings me to the point of this thread.
This series starts out brilliantly - a very fresh idea, deliciously morbid and grim, great character development, and very comedic, if not original villain (for a children's series). The books aren't long, but they are very entertaining in a 'book-a-day' sort of way. Mystery's are stumbled upon, bad guys are thwarted, people take sides, and by the 5th book, there are enough plot threads winging out into the darkness to make X-Files look like Goodnight Moon.
I was intrigued, and rushed to Book the 13th to discover what possible resolution the author might have, not only to the story of the children's unfortunate lives, but in hopes that I might discover the identity and story of Lemony Snickett, the cryptic author of this fine tale.
There is no fucking ending.
Now, for all of you who will undoubtedly respond with some feeble defense of existentialist bullshite, you can fuck the hell off right now. This thread isn't for you. Go away. :mad:
How long are we to tolerate this madness? Speaking of X-Files, I invested 13 (read: thir-fucking-teen) years in it only to realize in the last 3 episodes that Chris Carter had no idea whatsoever where he was going. I could care less that Mulder and Scully make whoopie. I want to know why CSM is cozy with Mrs. Mulder. I want to know what the green stuff and the black oil is. I want to know if earth survives the invasion. Valve is doing this shit to us as I speak with HL2. I'm being stood up by Smallville again this season (no comments from the peanut gallery about my entertainment tastes please). I'd bet my ass that Lost is bending us over right now. I'll never forgive the Wachowski brothers, and neither should you. Say what you will about Lucas fucking up the prequels, but I know that the story ends with the bad guys dead, the good guys alive, and the Ewoks dancing under the moon. Good enough for me.
I don't mind being left hanging if it's not the fault of the creator (System Shock, or Twin Peaks for instance), but when the creator of ANY series starts down that road to a 15 book deal, an 8 season contract, or the dreaded trilogy effect with toy tie-ins, I'm sorry, but THEY NEED TO HAVE A FUCKING ENDING IN MIND.
The Emperor has no clothes people. This idea that writers/creators are doing us a favor by letting us 'make up our own ending' is a lazy cop-out, and nothing more than an excuse to keep taking our money. You existentialists, don't fool yourselves - that carrot they keep dangling in front of you that makes you keep watching/buying/speculating? IT'S THE FUCKING ENDING. And I'm sick and tired of never seeing it delivered. I don't even care if it ends badly, quickly, or without warning.
I just want an ending. Is that too much to ask? Am I SO out of touch that I can't see the apparent genius behind the creation of sprawling epics with no endings? Help me out here. No less than the very future of my spare time is at stake.
Vivian on 20/2/2007 at 14:36
I think I'd rather have an unsatisfactory, anti-climatic ending than a tacked-on explosion. Most Ian M Banks books end with a series of wind-downs and dissapointments rather than a genunine, all-resolving climax, and while I agree that whats going on with stuff like lost is mindless attention-grabbing crap, I think an unresolved ending can keep you guessing and interested in a way that a million baddie-decapitation and girl-grabbing deus-ex-machina endings never can. Like in primer.
Oh sorry, you were talking about meandering, train-wreck endings that just look like the film ran out. Yeah, those suck.
Paz on 20/2/2007 at 14:57
Quote Posted by Uncle Bacon
meandering, train-wreck endings
Yeah,
The Last Battle was pretty bad.
fett on 20/2/2007 at 15:05
Hah - agreed, but yet purposely based on an external framework, and therefore Lewis was pretty much stuck with the ending.
Paz on 20/2/2007 at 15:22
Can you explain your usage of the term "existentialist" in reference to endings which you have found unsatisfactory? Most literature of this kind does, in fact, have a conclusion (The Stranger, etc.)
I think you might be using it as a synonym for relativism, but I'm not sure.
fett on 20/2/2007 at 15:36
I guess I'm using it very loosely to sum up the thinking that vague or 'non' endings are preferable since it allows the recipient to draw their own conclusions about what actually happened. That's fine to some extent - I don't need to know that Han and Leia have babies, or that Hawkeye returns to civilian life and becomes a famous surgeon (MASH), or how the fortune teller really know what was going to happen to Jack Sparrow. What pisses me off is when I spend countless hours invested in the various mysteries and hints that the creator has purposely placed to pique my interest, only to find out that he never intended to solve anything. It's tantamount to my wife walking across the bedroom in crotchless lingerie to go sleep on the couch.
driver on 20/2/2007 at 17:01
Granted there wasn't some great exposition at the end of The End, but Snickett did tie up most loose ends. The Epilogue seemed a bit forced, but it did give an idea as to what happens to the Baudelaires and finally told us who Beatrice was (Which in itself gave us a clue as to why Snickett was tracing the Baudelaires).
Raven on 20/2/2007 at 17:21
this whole thread leads nicely to a list those brilliant endings...
Quantum Leap
Angle
The last TNG tv episode.
the man has a point... I want more endings!!!
(I swear - that whole bloody smallville cast had better loses their memory and pick up exactly where Lois and Clark started (except the dad can stay dead) or else I will be super pissed off)
The_Raven on 20/2/2007 at 17:53
I would agree with Raven, Quantum Leap and the TNG endings still stay with me to this day. Though in Quantum Leap's case, I had no idea what was going on since it was the first Quantum Leap episode I saw in recent times.
I'm sure fett is using hyperbole, but I'll mention that X-Files only ran for 9 year and, yes, had one of the most stupid endings imaginable. Then again, since the show when so far downhill after season 5 did you really expect anything different?
PS. Please tell me more of your wife's crotchless panties.
PPS. I also hear they are virtually unattainable on the planet Algon.
Shayde on 20/2/2007 at 17:57
Quote Posted by fett
I could care less...
NO Spending too much time with teenagers ;)
Now that I got that out of the way I can say that I agree with you completely, there is nothing worse than the feeling that the author finally made enough and so cashed out without any real effort.
As far as Harry Potter goes I am confident that JK Rowling will tie up loose ends well but I am worried about the deus-ex-machina issue that Uncle Bacon mentioned.
Also fett you probably won't enjoy it, due to your distinct lack of girlyness, but my recommendation for teen lit is Stephenie Meyer's
Twilight.