*Zaccheus* on 3/3/2007 at 23:52
Quote Posted by Dr Sneak
As for the UK dick (who is on ignore) who blows off 9-11 as a 'mere 3000 deaths' those were my fellow citizens. You don't see any Americans here go around saying England only 'lost around 50 people in those subway bombings'
I'm happy to be called a 'UK dick' by someone who does not give a shit about the millions of people he'd not shed a tear over if they were nuked by his own government. And WE DID only loose a few dozen people in the subway bombings. We've lost more people at a football match. No need to go nuclear over that either.
Dr Sneak, happy for the US military to wipe out millions of innocent people, but gets upset because someone points out that the 3000 people who died on the 9th of September 2001 is a small number in comparison to what he would be ok with.
:rolleyes:
Vigil on 4/3/2007 at 00:12
Stop paying attention to the ill-considered and outrageous statement I now regret, and start acknowledging that at the same time as making that and other ill-considered and outrageous statements I also suggested we should have just packed up and left when we had the chance!
God how am I going to get my foot out of my mouth when you keep cramming it back in there you assholes
Quote:
had we simply nuked the mid-east on 9-12-01
that would have done the job without involving a nasty ground war that's claimed thousands of lives of our soldiers (not to mention injured and maimed) I would not have shed a tear, but yes I'd rather just leave instead
Now see here's the bit I'm most interested in:
What job?
What job do you see that needed to be done by hook or by crook in the middle east?
Destroying the infrastructure of a nation?
Alienating
the entire rest of the world and making them despise your country?
Highlighting the autocratic, corrupt and jingoistic foreign policies which the terrorist attacks were intended to protest against and draw international attention to in the first place?
Directly and indirectly causing the deaths of hundreds of thousands of innocent civilians?
You're quite right, you could have accomplished all that with a lot less fuss by using a nuclear weapon. But
what for?
Dr Sneak on 4/3/2007 at 00:50
Quote:
God how am I going to get my foot out of my mouth when you keep cramming it back in there you assholes
I dont have a 'foot in my mouth' . I do think some of you have something stuck up your asses however.;) And I regret nothing. :)
Quote:
What job do you see that needed to be done by hook or by crook in the middle east?
Eliminating the terror group that attacked us, which invading Iraq did not do.
Oh and those terror attacks weren't 'protests', they were a slaughter of innocent people.
Quote:
We've lost more people at a football match.
Just goes to show you're the ones who are dumb savages, not Americans just because our government has fucked up some stuff (as any government on the planet has at some point).
Vigil on 4/3/2007 at 00:58
And that rabble in the street isn't a protest, it's a mob of people carrying signs. Talk about not seeing the wood for the trees.
Furthermore, how can you be remotely sure a nuclear strike would wipe out the terror group that attacked you when you don't even know where they are?
Paz on 4/3/2007 at 01:26
Vigil, I love you, but you're trying to reason with a psychopath.
Dr Sneak on 4/3/2007 at 01:29
Quote:
Vigil, I love you, but you're trying to reason with a psychopath.
Vigil is a bastard trying to stir up trouble, and I am not a psychopath-although I think I've seen a few around here.:erg:
SD on 4/3/2007 at 03:43
Quote Posted by Dr Sneak
Oh and those terror attacks weren't 'protests', they were a slaughter of innocent people.
I'm intrigued as to what you'd consider the nuking of millions might be, if not "a slaughter of innocent people".
Briareos H on 4/3/2007 at 04:14
Why, the righteous hand of god, of course :cool:
Let's spread our radioactive love
Swiss Mercenary on 4/3/2007 at 07:14
Quote Posted by Strontium Dog
I'm intrigued as to what you'd consider the nuking of millions might be, if not "a slaughter of innocent people".
Obviously ragheads aren't innocent
or people says dr sneak
*Zaccheus* on 4/3/2007 at 13:11
Quote Posted by Dr Sneak
Just goes to show you're the ones who are dumb savages, not Americans just because our government has fucked up some stuff (as any government on the planet has at some point).
I get the feeling you need someone to tell you that the US is a great country. Ok, the US is a great country. People from the US have taken risks and done a lot of good all around the world, including in West Berlin where I grew up.
But I wasn't talking about the US, I was talking about you apparently not giving a shit about people outside the US, to the point where you'd be happy for millions of people to be exterminated if it meant you felt safer.
BTW - I thought you had me on ignore?
