io organic industrialism on 24/5/2016 at 21:14
Oh yeah baby!!! It's been a while since I've done one of these. In fact it's been a while since I've been on these forums until the last few days.
But yeah....
(
http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89443&highlight=election) http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=89443&highlight=election
In 2004, we voted for Kerry. Unfortunately we were wrong :(
(
http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=123182) http://www.ttlg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=123182
In 2008, we correctly voted for the Bama...
Who should be the next US president? Don't worry, if you're not from 'Murica, you're allowed to vote anyway!
froghawk on 24/5/2016 at 21:45
Isn't it a bit premature to do this before the final candidates have been selected?
If the option is there - Sanders. If not - Jill Stein.
Neb on 24/5/2016 at 21:50
Sanders
heywood on 24/5/2016 at 21:51
Where are the 3rd parties?
io organic industrialism on 24/5/2016 at 22:44
Quote Posted by heywood
Where are the 3rd parties?
They are irrelevant. If nobody wants to acknowledge that we can do this again in 3 or 4 months :)
froghawk on 24/5/2016 at 22:58
They're not irrelevant at all if one of them gets the 5% needed for federal funding. But if everyone pretends they're irrelevant, then they're never gonna get that, yeah.
Additionally, if Sanders takes California, he still has a chance. He's won or tied every May primary. So this is really too soon.
And where is Vermin Supreme???!?!
demagogue on 24/5/2016 at 23:14
They may be irrelevant to the general election but not the TTLG election, given that I think we may have a higher than normal variance in opinion.
io organic industrialism on 25/5/2016 at 00:07
Quote Posted by demagogue
They may be irrelevant to the general election but not the TTLG election, given that I think we may have a higher than normal variance in opinion.
OK. I'll add Sanders. Is there anybody else of relevance that should be added?
io organic industrialism on 25/5/2016 at 00:09
Hm. I can't see a way to edit the poll. Tell me the -serious- candidates only please, and I'll start a new thread!
P.S... I'm proud to live in North Carolina, where Deez Nuts was a serious contender at one point...
Inline Image:
https://pmchollywoodlife.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/deez-nuts-presidential-2016-ftr.jpgMy only confusion about that, is how people would seriously take their vote away from a real contender in the primaries, just for a laugh. Strange logic.
heywood on 25/5/2016 at 00:52
What a good little drone you are. Time to drag out the Simpsons:
[video]https://youtu.be/rAT_BuJAI70[/video]
Sorry, but I don't play the lesser of two evils game. That's a trap the two parties use to maintain their hegemony. I will not be voting for Trump or Clinton this November. I will be voting for someone else, although I'm not entirely sure yet who it will be, because it depends on which of the other party candidates has a shot at building a base.
For this to be a fair poll, it should include any small party candidates that are likely to be on the ballot in most states. Right now, that looks like it will be Jill Stein and Gary Johnson at a minimum. There's a fair chance another will emerge.
